Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 22, 2024Case LawsAT
Approval of Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors (Coc) and Adjudicating Authority - Group of 77 homebuyers as a class of creditors seeking rejection of plan. - the Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's arguments. It noted that the appellants failed to substantiate their claims regarding the resolution plan's unfairness or the alleged related party influence. The CoC's approval of the resolution plan was deemed to be based on the collective business wisdom of its members. - The Tribunal found no evidence that the CoC was irregularly constituted or that the financial creditor in question improperly participated in the CoC as a related party. - the Tribunal dismissed the allegations against the RP, noting that the RP had acted within the bounds of their duties and responsibilities.
Approval of Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors (Coc) and Adjudicating Authority - Group of 77 homebuyers as a class of creditors seeking rejection of plan. - the Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's arguments. It noted that the appellants failed to substantiate their claims regarding the resolution plan's unfairness or the alleged related party influence. The CoC's approval of the resolution plan was deemed to be based on the collective business wisdom of its members. - The Tribunal found no evidence that the CoC was irregularly constituted or that the financial creditor in question improperly participated in the CoC as a related party. - the Tribunal dismissed the allegations against the RP, noting that the RP had acted within the bounds of their duties and responsibilities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
