Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reversal of Cenvat Credit - The Tribunal interprets Rule 6(3A)(c)(iii) to mean that "total Cenvat credit" should only include common input and input services, not those exclusively used for dutiable goods. They find in favor of the appellant on this issue. - Regarding the prospective applicability of Notification No. 13/2016-CE (NT), the CESTAT determines that the amendment to Rule 6(3A) should have retrospective effect, supporting the appellant's argument. - The Tribunal also agrees with the appellant on the treatment of LPG & SKO as by-products, finding no reversal required for these items.
Reversal of Cenvat Credit - The Tribunal interprets Rule 6(3A)(c)(iii) to mean that "total Cenvat credit" should only include common input and input services, not those exclusively used for dutiable goods. They find in favor of the appellant on this issue. - Regarding the prospective applicability of Notification No. 13/2016-CE (NT), the CESTAT determines that the amendment to Rule 6(3A) should have retrospective effect, supporting the appellant's argument. - The Tribunal also agrees with the appellant on the treatment of LPG & SKO as by-products, finding no reversal required for these items.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
