Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of director - The petitioners argued that they had resigned from their directorship well before the cheque was issued and could not be held liable. The court examined the evidence, including resignation letters and company records, and found that the petitioners had indeed resigned before the cheque was issued. Relying on legal precedents, the court ruled that the petitioners could not be held liable for the dishonour of the cheque under the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of director - The petitioners argued that they had resigned from their directorship well before the cheque was issued and could not be held liable. The court examined the evidence, including resignation letters and company records, and found that the petitioners had indeed resigned before the cheque was issued. Relying on legal precedents, the court ruled that the petitioners could not be held liable for the dishonour of the cheque under the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
