Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of director - The petitioners argued that they had resigned from their directorship well before the cheque was issued and could not be held liable. The court examined the evidence, including resignation letters and company records, and found that the petitioners had indeed resigned before the cheque was issued. Relying on legal precedents, the court ruled that the petitioners could not be held liable for the dishonour of the cheque under the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of director - The petitioners argued that they had resigned from their directorship well before the cheque was issued and could not be held liable. The court examined the evidence, including resignation letters and company records, and found that the petitioners had indeed resigned before the cheque was issued. Relying on legal precedents, the court ruled that the petitioners could not be held liable for the dishonour of the cheque under the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
