Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Denial of Input Tax Credit - The case revolved around the disallowance of Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed by the petitioner due to discrepancies in their return and the GSTR-2A return. The petitioner explained that the discrepancy arose from an invoice issued by their supplier, which contained an incorrect GSTIN. Despite the respondent's suggestion to pursue rectification proceedings, the court intervened, noting the potential injustice faced by the petitioner. Upon verification of records, the court found merit in the petitioner's claim and quashed the assessment order. The matter was remanded to the assessing officer for fresh consideration.
Denial of Input Tax Credit - The case revolved around the disallowance of Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed by the petitioner due to discrepancies in their return and the GSTR-2A return. The petitioner explained that the discrepancy arose from an invoice issued by their supplier, which contained an incorrect GSTIN. Despite the respondent's suggestion to pursue rectification proceedings, the court intervened, noting the potential injustice faced by the petitioner. Upon verification of records, the court found merit in the petitioner's claim and quashed the assessment order. The matter was remanded to the assessing officer for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.