Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Denial of Input Tax Credit - The case revolved around the disallowance of Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed by the petitioner due to discrepancies in their return and the GSTR-2A return. The petitioner explained that the discrepancy arose from an invoice issued by their supplier, which contained an incorrect GSTIN. Despite the respondent's suggestion to pursue rectification proceedings, the court intervened, noting the potential injustice faced by the petitioner. Upon verification of records, the court found merit in the petitioner's claim and quashed the assessment order. The matter was remanded to the assessing officer for fresh consideration.
Denial of Input Tax Credit - The case revolved around the disallowance of Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed by the petitioner due to discrepancies in their return and the GSTR-2A return. The petitioner explained that the discrepancy arose from an invoice issued by their supplier, which contained an incorrect GSTIN. Despite the respondent's suggestion to pursue rectification proceedings, the court intervened, noting the potential injustice faced by the petitioner. Upon verification of records, the court found merit in the petitioner's claim and quashed the assessment order. The matter was remanded to the assessing officer for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
