Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of assessment u/s 153C - Period of limitation - Assessment of income of any other person in search proceedings - The proviso in Section 153C(1) includes not only the question of abatement but also determines the date from which the six-year limitation period should be calculated. - The High court analyzed the relevant legal provisions and case law, emphasizing the need to prevent prejudice to affected parties due to delayed proceedings. It concluded that the assessment orders were indeed barred by limitation, highlighting the unjustified delay in recording satisfaction. Considering the statutory limitation period and lapse of time for completing the assessment, the court quashed the assessment orders.
Validity of assessment u/s 153C - Period of limitation - Assessment of income of any other person in search proceedings - The proviso in Section 153C(1) includes not only the question of abatement but also determines the date from which the six-year limitation period should be calculated. - The High court analyzed the relevant legal provisions and case law, emphasizing the need to prevent prejudice to affected parties due to delayed proceedings. It concluded that the assessment orders were indeed barred by limitation, highlighting the unjustified delay in recording satisfaction. Considering the statutory limitation period and lapse of time for completing the assessment, the court quashed the assessment orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
