Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of the amount as deposited by the assesse towards part payment of demand raised - Time limit for completion of assessment, reassessment and recomputation - The High court referred to Section 153(5) and (7) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It noted that since the remit ordered by the ITAT was prior to June 1, 2016, it was the AO's duty to frame final assessment orders by March 31, 2017. - Given the AO's failure to meet the statutory deadline for framing assessment orders, the court found no justification for the respondents to retain the deposited amounts. - The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to refund the amounts along with applicable interest.
Refund of the amount as deposited by the assesse towards part payment of demand raised - Time limit for completion of assessment, reassessment and recomputation - The High court referred to Section 153(5) and (7) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It noted that since the remit ordered by the ITAT was prior to June 1, 2016, it was the AO's duty to frame final assessment orders by March 31, 2017. - Given the AO's failure to meet the statutory deadline for framing assessment orders, the court found no justification for the respondents to retain the deposited amounts. - The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to refund the amounts along with applicable interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
