Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of Penalty u/s. 271B for failure to get accounts audited u/s 44AB - The ITAT held that once a penalty has been levied under Section 271A for non-maintenance of books of accounts, no penalty under Section 271B can be levied. - Citing precedents and relevant case law, the Tribunal emphasized that Section 271B is not applicable when no accounts have been maintained, and recourse to Section 271A should be taken instead.
Levy of Penalty u/s. 271B for failure to get accounts audited u/s 44AB - The ITAT held that once a penalty has been levied under Section 271A for non-maintenance of books of accounts, no penalty under Section 271B can be levied. - Citing precedents and relevant case law, the Tribunal emphasized that Section 271B is not applicable when no accounts have been maintained, and recourse to Section 271A should be taken instead.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.