Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 21, 2024Case LawsAT
Seeking impleadment of Successful Auction Purchaser/Appellant as one of the Respondents - The NCLAT found that non-impleadment of the successful auction purchaser was deemed crucial and prejudicial to the proceedings. Despite directions from the adjudicating authority, necessary applications for impleadment were not filed. - The failure to include the successful auction purchaser as a respondent deprived them of the opportunity to present objections or responses, violating principles of natural justice. - The direction for a fresh e-auction process was set aside due to the aforementioned procedural irregularities and lack of fairness.
Seeking impleadment of Successful Auction Purchaser/Appellant as one of the Respondents - The NCLAT found that non-impleadment of the successful auction purchaser was deemed crucial and prejudicial to the proceedings. Despite directions from the adjudicating authority, necessary applications for impleadment were not filed. - The failure to include the successful auction purchaser as a respondent deprived them of the opportunity to present objections or responses, violating principles of natural justice. - The direction for a fresh e-auction process was set aside due to the aforementioned procedural irregularities and lack of fairness.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.