Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Money Laundering - scheduled offences - cognizance of offence - The High court concluded that the allegations did not meet the necessary elements to constitute an offence under Section 3 of the PMLA. There was no prima facie evidence to suggest the petitioner knowingly facilitated the transfer of proceeds of the crime. The court emphasized that intent is crucial for constituting an offence under the PMLA, and such intent was not established against the petitioner. - The court quashed the proceedings against the petitioner, accused No. 7, stating that continuing the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law.
Money Laundering - scheduled offences - cognizance of offence - The High court concluded that the allegations did not meet the necessary elements to constitute an offence under Section 3 of the PMLA. There was no prima facie evidence to suggest the petitioner knowingly facilitated the transfer of proceeds of the crime. The court emphasized that intent is crucial for constituting an offence under the PMLA, and such intent was not established against the petitioner. - The court quashed the proceedings against the petitioner, accused No. 7, stating that continuing the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
