Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
741 to 760 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SVLDRS - Recovery of arrears of tax in terms of Section 124(1)(c) of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme Rules, 2019 in the Finance Act, 2019 - jurisdiction under Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994 was invoked to rectify the mistake - The High court found that initiating a rectification proceeding under Section 74 cannot be equated with filing an appeal under Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994. Therefore, the petitioner’s case could not be considered under the appeal category for SVLDRS relief, which necessitates a different calculation of the dues. - The court allowed the settlement under SVLDRS upon payment of the due amount and interest.
SVLDRS - Recovery of arrears of tax in terms of Section 124(1)(c) of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme Rules, 2019 in the Finance Act, 2019 - jurisdiction under Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994 was invoked to rectify the mistake - The High court found that initiating a rectification proceeding under Section 74 cannot be equated with filing an appeal under Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994. Therefore, the petitioner’s case could not be considered under the appeal category for SVLDRS relief, which necessitates a different calculation of the dues. - The court allowed the settlement under SVLDRS upon payment of the due amount and interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
