Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
SVLDRS - Recovery of arrears of tax in terms of Section 124(1)(c) of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme Rules, 2019 in the Finance Act, 2019 - jurisdiction under Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994 was invoked to rectify the mistake - The High court found that initiating a rectification proceeding under Section 74 cannot be equated with filing an appeal under Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994. Therefore, the petitioner’s case could not be considered under the appeal category for SVLDRS relief, which necessitates a different calculation of the dues. - The court allowed the settlement under SVLDRS upon payment of the due amount and interest.
SVLDRS - Recovery of arrears of tax in terms of Section 124(1)(c) of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme Rules, 2019 in the Finance Act, 2019 - jurisdiction under Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994 was invoked to rectify the mistake - The High court found that initiating a rectification proceeding under Section 74 cannot be equated with filing an appeal under Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994. Therefore, the petitioner’s case could not be considered under the appeal category for SVLDRS relief, which necessitates a different calculation of the dues. - The court allowed the settlement under SVLDRS upon payment of the due amount and interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.