Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Seeking rectification of an alleged mistake - question of jurisdiction of this tribunal - error apparent on the face of record or not - The Tribunal rejected the appellant's claim, stating that it had considered the jurisdiction issue in light of previous judgments and amendments. Since both parties chose not to argue the jurisdiction issue during the hearing, the Tribunal proceeded to decide the case on its merits. - The Tribunal emphasized that when a counsel makes submissions, it is presumed to be on the instructions of the appellant. Hiring a new counsel post-judgment to raise new grounds or find fault with the previous counsel's submissions is not a valid approach.
Seeking rectification of an alleged mistake - question of jurisdiction of this tribunal - error apparent on the face of record or not - The Tribunal rejected the appellant's claim, stating that it had considered the jurisdiction issue in light of previous judgments and amendments. Since both parties chose not to argue the jurisdiction issue during the hearing, the Tribunal proceeded to decide the case on its merits. - The Tribunal emphasized that when a counsel makes submissions, it is presumed to be on the instructions of the appellant. Hiring a new counsel post-judgment to raise new grounds or find fault with the previous counsel's submissions is not a valid approach.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
