Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Recovery of duty foregone - non-fulfillment of export obligation - non-installation of the capital goods and consequent non-fulfilment of post-importation condition - The Tribunal observed that the imported goods were not installed as they were stored pending land acquisition for setting up a manufacturing facility. The appellant claimed to have fulfilled the export obligation within the extended time frame but failed to provide evidence of exports after installation. It was noted that the extension of time for installation did not automatically extend the deadline for fulfilling the export obligation. - The Tribunal deemed the confirmation of duty liability reasonable due to non-fulfillment of the export obligation within the prescribed period. - However matter remanded back for a fresh decision considering all relevant factors, including evidence of exports and entitlement to depreciation based on export performance.
Recovery of duty foregone - non-fulfillment of export obligation - non-installation of the capital goods and consequent non-fulfilment of post-importation condition - The Tribunal observed that the imported goods were not installed as they were stored pending land acquisition for setting up a manufacturing facility. The appellant claimed to have fulfilled the export obligation within the extended time frame but failed to provide evidence of exports after installation. It was noted that the extension of time for installation did not automatically extend the deadline for fulfilling the export obligation. - The Tribunal deemed the confirmation of duty liability reasonable due to non-fulfillment of the export obligation within the prescribed period. - However matter remanded back for a fresh decision considering all relevant factors, including evidence of exports and entitlement to depreciation based on export performance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
