Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Classification of goods - Import of Nutrition/Dietary Supplements - Levy of IGST @18% or 28% on Import - The tribunal noted that the Revenue argued for the classification of the goods under Serial No. 9 of Schedule IV, which attracted an IGST rate of 28%. - After a detailed analysis, the tribunal concluded that the goods in question did not fall under Serial No. 9 of Schedule IV. Instead, they determined that the correct classification was under Serial No. 453 and/or 23 of Schedule III, which attracted an IGST rate of 18%. - Therefore, the tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, granting consequential relief as per law.
Classification of goods - Import of Nutrition/Dietary Supplements - Levy of IGST @18% or 28% on Import - The tribunal noted that the Revenue argued for the classification of the goods under Serial No. 9 of Schedule IV, which attracted an IGST rate of 28%. - After a detailed analysis, the tribunal concluded that the goods in question did not fall under Serial No. 9 of Schedule IV. Instead, they determined that the correct classification was under Serial No. 453 and/or 23 of Schedule III, which attracted an IGST rate of 18%. - Therefore, the tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, granting consequential relief as per law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
