Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1181 to 1200 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Defective SCN - The High court observed that the show cause notice lacked clarity regarding the grounds of alleged violation and did not contain essential details such as the name, designation, or signature of the issuing authority. - It noted that although the notice mentioned attached supporting documents, none were actually attached. - The court further highlighted that the Form GST REG 31 produced by the respondents did not serve as a proper show cause notice for cancellation of registration. - The court set aside both the show cause notice and Form GST REG 31, emphasizing that the respondents could issue a proper notice in accordance with the law if necessary.
Defective SCN - The High court observed that the show cause notice lacked clarity regarding the grounds of alleged violation and did not contain essential details such as the name, designation, or signature of the issuing authority. - It noted that although the notice mentioned attached supporting documents, none were actually attached. - The court further highlighted that the Form GST REG 31 produced by the respondents did not serve as a proper show cause notice for cancellation of registration. - The court set aside both the show cause notice and Form GST REG 31, emphasizing that the respondents could issue a proper notice in accordance with the law if necessary.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
