Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Defective SCN - The High court observed that the show cause notice lacked clarity regarding the grounds of alleged violation and did not contain essential details such as the name, designation, or signature of the issuing authority. - It noted that although the notice mentioned attached supporting documents, none were actually attached. - The court further highlighted that the Form GST REG 31 produced by the respondents did not serve as a proper show cause notice for cancellation of registration. - The court set aside both the show cause notice and Form GST REG 31, emphasizing that the respondents could issue a proper notice in accordance with the law if necessary.
Defective SCN - The High court observed that the show cause notice lacked clarity regarding the grounds of alleged violation and did not contain essential details such as the name, designation, or signature of the issuing authority. - It noted that although the notice mentioned attached supporting documents, none were actually attached. - The court further highlighted that the Form GST REG 31 produced by the respondents did not serve as a proper show cause notice for cancellation of registration. - The court set aside both the show cause notice and Form GST REG 31, emphasizing that the respondents could issue a proper notice in accordance with the law if necessary.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.