Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Misuse of Advance Authorisation for export of garments - Diversion of imported goods into open market without using the same in export goods - The Tribunal upheld the denial of benefit under Customs Notification No. 99/2009 due to overwhelming evidence of diversion of imported goods into the open market. The CESTAT noted the failure of the appellant to fulfill export obligations as required. - The Tribunal rejected the appellant's argument regarding the violation of principles of natural justice. It noted that the Department partly acceded to the request for cross-examination, and the appellant's lack of cooperation during investigations weakened their claim.
Misuse of Advance Authorisation for export of garments - Diversion of imported goods into open market without using the same in export goods - The Tribunal upheld the denial of benefit under Customs Notification No. 99/2009 due to overwhelming evidence of diversion of imported goods into the open market. The CESTAT noted the failure of the appellant to fulfill export obligations as required. - The Tribunal rejected the appellant's argument regarding the violation of principles of natural justice. It noted that the Department partly acceded to the request for cross-examination, and the appellant's lack of cooperation during investigations weakened their claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
