Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Refund including cash refund of DEPB/FPS scrips - principles of unjust enrichment - The Tribunal examined the facts surrounding the refund claims and acknowledged the respondent's reliance on the London Metal Exchange (LME) for pricing. They found that the price of the final products was determined based on LME prices, which were beyond the control of the respondent. - The CESTAT concluded that the principle of unjust enrichment did not apply in this case. They emphasized that the final product prices were based on LME prices, and there was no evidence of the duty burden being passed on to buyers.
Refund including cash refund of DEPB/FPS scrips - principles of unjust enrichment - The Tribunal examined the facts surrounding the refund claims and acknowledged the respondent's reliance on the London Metal Exchange (LME) for pricing. They found that the price of the final products was determined based on LME prices, which were beyond the control of the respondent. - The CESTAT concluded that the principle of unjust enrichment did not apply in this case. They emphasized that the final product prices were based on LME prices, and there was no evidence of the duty burden being passed on to buyers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
