Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 20, 2024Case LawsAT
Consideration of Resolution Plan from Non-Listed Applicants - Authority of CoC to Modify Invitation for Expression of Interest (EOI) - The NCLAT upheld Regulation 39(1)(b) which states that the CoC should not consider plans from applicants not listed as PRAs. It was noted that neither the mentioned applicant nor other similar applicants submitted an Expression of Interest (EOI) or were listed as PRAs. - The NCLAT affirmed that the CoC has the authority to modify the EOI and decide not to consider applications from non-listed applicants. It was emphasized that the CoC's decision was crucial in determining the direction of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
Consideration of Resolution Plan from Non-Listed Applicants - Authority of CoC to Modify Invitation for Expression of Interest (EOI) - The NCLAT upheld Regulation 39(1)(b) which states that the CoC should not consider plans from applicants not listed as PRAs. It was noted that neither the mentioned applicant nor other similar applicants submitted an Expression of Interest (EOI) or were listed as PRAs. - The NCLAT affirmed that the CoC has the authority to modify the EOI and decide not to consider applications from non-listed applicants. It was emphasized that the CoC's decision was crucial in determining the direction of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
