Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 20, 2024Case LawsAT
Consideration of Resolution Plan from Non-Listed Applicants - Authority of CoC to Modify Invitation for Expression of Interest (EOI) - The NCLAT upheld Regulation 39(1)(b) which states that the CoC should not consider plans from applicants not listed as PRAs. It was noted that neither the mentioned applicant nor other similar applicants submitted an Expression of Interest (EOI) or were listed as PRAs. - The NCLAT affirmed that the CoC has the authority to modify the EOI and decide not to consider applications from non-listed applicants. It was emphasized that the CoC's decision was crucial in determining the direction of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
Consideration of Resolution Plan from Non-Listed Applicants - Authority of CoC to Modify Invitation for Expression of Interest (EOI) - The NCLAT upheld Regulation 39(1)(b) which states that the CoC should not consider plans from applicants not listed as PRAs. It was noted that neither the mentioned applicant nor other similar applicants submitted an Expression of Interest (EOI) or were listed as PRAs. - The NCLAT affirmed that the CoC has the authority to modify the EOI and decide not to consider applications from non-listed applicants. It was emphasized that the CoC's decision was crucial in determining the direction of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.