Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Manner of payment of Pre-deposit amount before filing of appeal against demand of service tax - Admissibility of payment of pre-deposit using DRC-03 - The appellant argued that they had deposited the pre-deposit using the input tax credit available in their DRC-03 under CGST regime. - Considering the absence of a specific provision allowing pre-deposit via DRC-03, the Tribunal rejected the appellant's argument and relied on various judicial precedents to affirm that such a method was not permissible under Section 35F.
Manner of payment of Pre-deposit amount before filing of appeal against demand of service tax - Admissibility of payment of pre-deposit using DRC-03 - The appellant argued that they had deposited the pre-deposit using the input tax credit available in their DRC-03 under CGST regime. - Considering the absence of a specific provision allowing pre-deposit via DRC-03, the Tribunal rejected the appellant's argument and relied on various judicial precedents to affirm that such a method was not permissible under Section 35F.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
