Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction u/s 80IA - The Revenue contended that the filing of Form 10CCB within the prescribed date is mandatory, while the assessee argued otherwise. The Tribunal, after analyzing the relevant legal provisions, concluded that while the filing of Form 10CCB is mandatory, adhering to the prescribed due date is not. The Tribunal also noted that the CIT(A) failed to properly consider legal precedents and independently assess the facts of the case. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s decision and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Deduction u/s 80IA - The Revenue contended that the filing of Form 10CCB within the prescribed date is mandatory, while the assessee argued otherwise. The Tribunal, after analyzing the relevant legal provisions, concluded that while the filing of Form 10CCB is mandatory, adhering to the prescribed due date is not. The Tribunal also noted that the CIT(A) failed to properly consider legal precedents and independently assess the facts of the case. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s decision and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.