Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Cancellation of grant of authorised operations of warehousing service activities - Section 16 of the SEZ Act, 2005 - The High Court found that the impugned letter, which suspended D.T.A. clearance, lacked legal basis. It observed that the respondents failed to cite any provision of the SEZ Act to justify their actions. - Consequently, the Court quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 01st November, 2023. It directed the respondents to proceed with the adjudication of the show-cause notice dated 08th January, 2024, in accordance with the law.
Cancellation of grant of authorised operations of warehousing service activities - Section 16 of the SEZ Act, 2005 - The High Court found that the impugned letter, which suspended D.T.A. clearance, lacked legal basis. It observed that the respondents failed to cite any provision of the SEZ Act to justify their actions. - Consequently, the Court quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 01st November, 2023. It directed the respondents to proceed with the adjudication of the show-cause notice dated 08th January, 2024, in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
