Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Refund of SAD - The appellant, a trader, imported goods and claimed a refund on the paid Special Additional Duty (SAD). However, the refund claims were rejected by the authorities, citing the absence of Chartered Accountant certificates and endorsements in sales invoices regarding CENVAT credit availability. The appellant contested these rejections, providing evidence of compliance with the conditions for refund. The CESTAT, after reviewing the submissions and evidence, concluded that the appellant fulfilled the requirements for the refund.
Refund of SAD - The appellant, a trader, imported goods and claimed a refund on the paid Special Additional Duty (SAD). However, the refund claims were rejected by the authorities, citing the absence of Chartered Accountant certificates and endorsements in sales invoices regarding CENVAT credit availability. The appellant contested these rejections, providing evidence of compliance with the conditions for refund. The CESTAT, after reviewing the submissions and evidence, concluded that the appellant fulfilled the requirements for the refund.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
