Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 19, 2024Case LawsAT
Maintainability of appeal - time limitation - Whether appeals filed without certified copies of the impugned orders, due to delays in obtaining them? - The Tribunal considered the mandatory requirement of annexing certified copies with appeals, as stipulated in its rules, against the backdrop of Supreme Court decisions emphasizing procedural law as a means to aid justice rather than hinder it. The NCLAT granted exemptions for filing certified copies in ten appeals where such applications were made, recognizing the Tribunal's power to exempt compliance with procedural requirements for substantial justice. However, it dismissed three appeals where no exemption applications were filed, reinforcing the necessity of following prescribed procedural norms.
Maintainability of appeal - time limitation - Whether appeals filed without certified copies of the impugned orders, due to delays in obtaining them? - The Tribunal considered the mandatory requirement of annexing certified copies with appeals, as stipulated in its rules, against the backdrop of Supreme Court decisions emphasizing procedural law as a means to aid justice rather than hinder it. The NCLAT granted exemptions for filing certified copies in ten appeals where such applications were made, recognizing the Tribunal's power to exempt compliance with procedural requirements for substantial justice. However, it dismissed three appeals where no exemption applications were filed, reinforcing the necessity of following prescribed procedural norms.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.