Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The case involved appeals regarding the denial of CENVAT credit, invocation of extended period of limitation, demand of interest on capital goods CENVAT credit, denial of credit on certain items, and imposition of penalties. The CESTAT found in favor of the appellant on all counts, ruling that the denial of credit, demand of interest, and imposition of penalties were unjustified. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.
The case involved appeals regarding the denial of CENVAT credit, invocation of extended period of limitation, demand of interest on capital goods CENVAT credit, denial of credit on certain items, and imposition of penalties. The CESTAT found in favor of the appellant on all counts, ruling that the denial of credit, demand of interest, and imposition of penalties were unjustified. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.