Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The case involved appeals regarding the denial of CENVAT credit, invocation of extended period of limitation, demand of interest on capital goods CENVAT credit, denial of credit on certain items, and imposition of penalties. The CESTAT found in favor of the appellant on all counts, ruling that the denial of credit, demand of interest, and imposition of penalties were unjustified. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.
The case involved appeals regarding the denial of CENVAT credit, invocation of extended period of limitation, demand of interest on capital goods CENVAT credit, denial of credit on certain items, and imposition of penalties. The CESTAT found in favor of the appellant on all counts, ruling that the denial of credit, demand of interest, and imposition of penalties were unjustified. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
