Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Recovery notice - Validity of assessment orders - The High court observed that while personal hearings were offered to the petitioner, it was evident that the petitioner was not heard during the assessment process. Additionally, the assessing officer relied on internet-based information without affording the petitioner an opportunity to challenge or provide contrary evidence. Consequently, the court found the lack of proper opportunity for the petitioner to be heard as a procedural irregularity, warranting interference. - Matter restored back for fresh adjudication.
Recovery notice - Validity of assessment orders - The High court observed that while personal hearings were offered to the petitioner, it was evident that the petitioner was not heard during the assessment process. Additionally, the assessing officer relied on internet-based information without affording the petitioner an opportunity to challenge or provide contrary evidence. Consequently, the court found the lack of proper opportunity for the petitioner to be heard as a procedural irregularity, warranting interference. - Matter restored back for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.