Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Recovery notice - Validity of assessment orders - The High court observed that while personal hearings were offered to the petitioner, it was evident that the petitioner was not heard during the assessment process. Additionally, the assessing officer relied on internet-based information without affording the petitioner an opportunity to challenge or provide contrary evidence. Consequently, the court found the lack of proper opportunity for the petitioner to be heard as a procedural irregularity, warranting interference. - Matter restored back for fresh adjudication.
Recovery notice - Validity of assessment orders - The High court observed that while personal hearings were offered to the petitioner, it was evident that the petitioner was not heard during the assessment process. Additionally, the assessing officer relied on internet-based information without affording the petitioner an opportunity to challenge or provide contrary evidence. Consequently, the court found the lack of proper opportunity for the petitioner to be heard as a procedural irregularity, warranting interference. - Matter restored back for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.