Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    SFIO prosecutions need no pre-cognizance hearing; special Companies Act procedure overrides general BNSS complaint rules.
    Depository supervisory negligence supports investor indemnification, while Section 37 prevents reappreciation of a plausible award.
    Directory adjudication deadline under service tax law cannot be invoked by an assessee who caused the delay.
    Exemption for examination-related services rejected where recipients were commercial entities; suppression sustained extended limitation and penalties...
    Interest on delayed refund awarded from payment date after illegal tax retention without show cause notice.
    Principal-to-principal land sale and Rule 2A valuation issues defeat selective service tax demands under works contracts
    Suppression and wrongful Cenvat credit justified extended limitation and penalty under indirect tax law for service tax claims.
    Prospective operation of Section 11D bars recovery of pre-1991 excise collections despite the non obstante clause.
    Water-handling pump classification determines excise exemption for boiler feed and condensate extraction pumps under tariff
    Parallel GST proceedings bar applies only after adjudication begins; lawful arrest upheld and petition dismissed
    Alternative statutory remedy bars writ review where the GST Tribunal can examine circulars and the amended refund rule.
    IGST export refund under Rule 96 must be processed when Rule 96(4) contingencies are absent.
    Omission of refund-restricting rule without saving clause bars pending denial proceedings and quashes consequential orders
    Interest on delayed refund runs from the original application date after illegal refusal is set aside
    Proper service of GST show cause notice failed when uploaded under the wrong portal tab, invalidating ex parte adjudication.
    GST reimbursement in works contracts remains contractual, while statutory return, limitation and penalty relief cannot be ordered.
    Live nexus required for reassessment: third-party seized land register entries cannot justify reopening without a direct link to the assessee.
    Charitable purpose under general public utility survives revenue-generating activities undertaken to advance statutory objects.
    Retrospective reassessment jurisdiction upheld, while constitutional challenge to Section 147A was left for Division Bench review.
    Section 80GGC deduction denied where political donation was found to be an accommodation entry on surrounding circumstances.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Requirement of 20% Deposit of Disputed Demand for Considering...

Court Rules No Mandatory 20% Deposit Needed for Stay on Demand Recovery; Flexibility Based on Case Specifics.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax March 18, 2024 Case Laws HC
Requirement of 20% Deposit of Disputed Demand for Considering Stay Application - The High court clarified that the OMs do not mandate a 20% deposit as a precondition for granting stay against demand recovery. It was held that such an interpretation is misconceived and that the discretion to require a deposit, either more or less than 20%, depends on the facts of each case. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's application for stay under Section 220(6) without the presumption of a mandatory 20% deposit.

Topics

Acts Income Tax