Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Requirement of 20% Deposit of Disputed Demand for Considering Stay Application - The High court clarified that the OMs do not mandate a 20% deposit as a precondition for granting stay against demand recovery. It was held that such an interpretation is misconceived and that the discretion to require a deposit, either more or less than 20%, depends on the facts of each case. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's application for stay under Section 220(6) without the presumption of a mandatory 20% deposit.
Requirement of 20% Deposit of Disputed Demand for Considering Stay Application - The High court clarified that the OMs do not mandate a 20% deposit as a precondition for granting stay against demand recovery. It was held that such an interpretation is misconceived and that the discretion to require a deposit, either more or less than 20%, depends on the facts of each case. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's application for stay under Section 220(6) without the presumption of a mandatory 20% deposit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
