Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Assessment u/s 153A - completed assessments to be interfered with by the A.O. while making the assessment u/s 153A - The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the addition. - The ITAT reiterated the principle that completed assessments can only be interfered with by the AO under Section 153A based on incriminating material found during the search. Since the revenue failed to demonstrate that the additions were made on such basis, the court found no reason to interfere with the order of the Ld. CIT(A).
Assessment u/s 153A - completed assessments to be interfered with by the A.O. while making the assessment u/s 153A - The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the addition. - The ITAT reiterated the principle that completed assessments can only be interfered with by the AO under Section 153A based on incriminating material found during the search. Since the revenue failed to demonstrate that the additions were made on such basis, the court found no reason to interfere with the order of the Ld. CIT(A).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.