Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Assessment u/s 153A - completed assessments to be interfered with by the A.O. while making the assessment u/s 153A - The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the addition. - The ITAT reiterated the principle that completed assessments can only be interfered with by the AO under Section 153A based on incriminating material found during the search. Since the revenue failed to demonstrate that the additions were made on such basis, the court found no reason to interfere with the order of the Ld. CIT(A).
Assessment u/s 153A - completed assessments to be interfered with by the A.O. while making the assessment u/s 153A - The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the addition. - The ITAT reiterated the principle that completed assessments can only be interfered with by the AO under Section 153A based on incriminating material found during the search. Since the revenue failed to demonstrate that the additions were made on such basis, the court found no reason to interfere with the order of the Ld. CIT(A).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
