Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Nature of land - capital gain on sale of land - exemption u/s 10(37) - assessee's agricultural land was compulsorily acquired by following entire procedure prescribed under Land Acquisition Act - character of acquisition - Revenue contested the CIT(A)'s acceptance of 1947 as the year of transfer instead of 19.05.2014 (date of final award). - The Tribunal held that the peculiar circumstances warranted consideration of the land's acquisition date as 1947 for the purpose of exemption under Section 10(37), emphasizing the continuous possession by the state and non-alteration in land's status due to delayed compensation. - The ITAT observed that the land's character and use as agricultural at the time of its original acquisition in 1947 were crucial, dismissing the relevance of its status immediately before the compensation award in 2014 for the purposes of Section 10(37).
Nature of land - capital gain on sale of land - exemption u/s 10(37) - assessee's agricultural land was compulsorily acquired by following entire procedure prescribed under Land Acquisition Act - character of acquisition - Revenue contested the CIT(A)'s acceptance of 1947 as the year of transfer instead of 19.05.2014 (date of final award). - The Tribunal held that the peculiar circumstances warranted consideration of the land's acquisition date as 1947 for the purpose of exemption under Section 10(37), emphasizing the continuous possession by the state and non-alteration in land's status due to delayed compensation. - The ITAT observed that the land's character and use as agricultural at the time of its original acquisition in 1947 were crucial, dismissing the relevance of its status immediately before the compensation award in 2014 for the purposes of Section 10(37).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
