Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
781 to 800 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Nature of land - capital gain on sale of land - exemption u/s 10(37) - assessee's agricultural land was compulsorily acquired by following entire procedure prescribed under Land Acquisition Act - character of acquisition - Revenue contested the CIT(A)'s acceptance of 1947 as the year of transfer instead of 19.05.2014 (date of final award). - The Tribunal held that the peculiar circumstances warranted consideration of the land's acquisition date as 1947 for the purpose of exemption under Section 10(37), emphasizing the continuous possession by the state and non-alteration in land's status due to delayed compensation. - The ITAT observed that the land's character and use as agricultural at the time of its original acquisition in 1947 were crucial, dismissing the relevance of its status immediately before the compensation award in 2014 for the purposes of Section 10(37).
Nature of land - capital gain on sale of land - exemption u/s 10(37) - assessee's agricultural land was compulsorily acquired by following entire procedure prescribed under Land Acquisition Act - character of acquisition - Revenue contested the CIT(A)'s acceptance of 1947 as the year of transfer instead of 19.05.2014 (date of final award). - The Tribunal held that the peculiar circumstances warranted consideration of the land's acquisition date as 1947 for the purpose of exemption under Section 10(37), emphasizing the continuous possession by the state and non-alteration in land's status due to delayed compensation. - The ITAT observed that the land's character and use as agricultural at the time of its original acquisition in 1947 were crucial, dismissing the relevance of its status immediately before the compensation award in 2014 for the purposes of Section 10(37).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
