Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Valuation of Goods - Contemporaneous Imports of camera stabilizer devices - identical/similar items with the same model numbers at higher and different unit prices - The Supreme Court observed that a comparative table of the imported goods showed them to be identical or similar to earlier imports, except for being labeled as an "unpopular brand." The Court noted the appellant's admission of minor differences in hardware and software but affirmed the finding that the goods were essentially the same. As such, the Court upheld the decision to discard the declared transaction value and impose penalties.
Valuation of Goods - Contemporaneous Imports of camera stabilizer devices - identical/similar items with the same model numbers at higher and different unit prices - The Supreme Court observed that a comparative table of the imported goods showed them to be identical or similar to earlier imports, except for being labeled as an "unpopular brand." The Court noted the appellant's admission of minor differences in hardware and software but affirmed the finding that the goods were essentially the same. As such, the Court upheld the decision to discard the declared transaction value and impose penalties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.