Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Classification of supply of goods - Water including natural or artificial mineral waters and aerated waters, not containing added sugar or sweetening matter, not flavoured (other than drinking water packed in 20 litre bottles) - The case revolves around the classification of the output and water sold by the Appellant, an effluent treatment plant. Disputes arose regarding whether the output should be classified as goods and if the water sold falls under a specific heading. The AAAR ordered a re-examination of the matter by the lower authority in light of new evidence presented during the appeal process.
Classification of supply of goods - Water including natural or artificial mineral waters and aerated waters, not containing added sugar or sweetening matter, not flavoured (other than drinking water packed in 20 litre bottles) - The case revolves around the classification of the output and water sold by the Appellant, an effluent treatment plant. Disputes arose regarding whether the output should be classified as goods and if the water sold falls under a specific heading. The AAAR ordered a re-examination of the matter by the lower authority in light of new evidence presented during the appeal process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.