Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Classification of supply of goods - Water including natural or artificial mineral waters and aerated waters, not containing added sugar or sweetening matter, not flavoured (other than drinking water packed in 20 litre bottles) - The case revolves around the classification of the output and water sold by the Appellant, an effluent treatment plant. Disputes arose regarding whether the output should be classified as goods and if the water sold falls under a specific heading. The AAAR ordered a re-examination of the matter by the lower authority in light of new evidence presented during the appeal process.
Classification of supply of goods - Water including natural or artificial mineral waters and aerated waters, not containing added sugar or sweetening matter, not flavoured (other than drinking water packed in 20 litre bottles) - The case revolves around the classification of the output and water sold by the Appellant, an effluent treatment plant. Disputes arose regarding whether the output should be classified as goods and if the water sold falls under a specific heading. The AAAR ordered a re-examination of the matter by the lower authority in light of new evidence presented during the appeal process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.