Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Rejection of application for Advance Ruling - Levy of GST - The appellate authority observed that the rejection of the advance ruling application was based on the investigation initiated by DGGI. The rejection did not consider the GST applicability issue directly. - The authority found that the rejection of the application lacked procedural fairness. The appellant was not provided with materials and comments forwarded by DGGI, depriving them of the opportunity to respond. Consequently, the case was remanded to the lower authority for reconsideration while ensuring the appellant's right to a fair hearing.
Rejection of application for Advance Ruling - Levy of GST - The appellate authority observed that the rejection of the advance ruling application was based on the investigation initiated by DGGI. The rejection did not consider the GST applicability issue directly. - The authority found that the rejection of the application lacked procedural fairness. The appellant was not provided with materials and comments forwarded by DGGI, depriving them of the opportunity to respond. Consequently, the case was remanded to the lower authority for reconsideration while ensuring the appellant's right to a fair hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
