Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment - shares were transferred by way of a gift - The petitioner argued that the transfer of shares as a gift did not attract capital gains tax liability and that there was no valid reason to believe income had escaped assessment. In this case, Section 45 read with Section 47 read with Section 48 of the Act makes it clear that the AO could not have any tangible material to form a belief that income has escaped assessment. - The court upheld the petitioner's arguments, ruling that the notice lacked validity due to the absence of tangible material supporting income escapement and confirming that the transfer of shares as a gift did not incur capital gains tax liability.
Reopening of assessment - shares were transferred by way of a gift - The petitioner argued that the transfer of shares as a gift did not attract capital gains tax liability and that there was no valid reason to believe income had escaped assessment. In this case, Section 45 read with Section 47 read with Section 48 of the Act makes it clear that the AO could not have any tangible material to form a belief that income has escaped assessment. - The court upheld the petitioner's arguments, ruling that the notice lacked validity due to the absence of tangible material supporting income escapement and confirming that the transfer of shares as a gift did not incur capital gains tax liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.