Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Reopening of assessment - shares were transferred by way of a gift - The petitioner argued that the transfer of shares as a gift did not attract capital gains tax liability and that there was no valid reason to believe income had escaped assessment. In this case, Section 45 read with Section 47 read with Section 48 of the Act makes it clear that the AO could not have any tangible material to form a belief that income has escaped assessment. - The court upheld the petitioner's arguments, ruling that the notice lacked validity due to the absence of tangible material supporting income escapement and confirming that the transfer of shares as a gift did not incur capital gains tax liability.
Reopening of assessment - shares were transferred by way of a gift - The petitioner argued that the transfer of shares as a gift did not attract capital gains tax liability and that there was no valid reason to believe income had escaped assessment. In this case, Section 45 read with Section 47 read with Section 48 of the Act makes it clear that the AO could not have any tangible material to form a belief that income has escaped assessment. - The court upheld the petitioner's arguments, ruling that the notice lacked validity due to the absence of tangible material supporting income escapement and confirming that the transfer of shares as a gift did not incur capital gains tax liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.