Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - claim of deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) - provision for Non-Performing Advances as per the RBI Regulations - The court observed that the petitioner had adequately addressed the AO's queries regarding the deduction claim during the original assessment. Additionally, the court noted that the petitioner had not claimed any deduction for rural advances, contradicting the basis for the alleged escapement of income. - The court deemed the reopening of the assessment as a clear case of change of opinion by the AO, which did not justify reassessment.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - claim of deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) - provision for Non-Performing Advances as per the RBI Regulations - The court observed that the petitioner had adequately addressed the AO's queries regarding the deduction claim during the original assessment. Additionally, the court noted that the petitioner had not claimed any deduction for rural advances, contradicting the basis for the alleged escapement of income. - The court deemed the reopening of the assessment as a clear case of change of opinion by the AO, which did not justify reassessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.