Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
TP Adjustment - Interest on delayed receivables - The ITAT found that the conditions laid down by previous rulings, specifically in the case of PCIT vs. Kusum Healthcare, were met, justifying the inclusion of interest on delayed receivables as a separate international transaction. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper inquiry by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) over time to identify patterns indicating benefits to AEs, and rejected the appellant's argument that the receivables' impact was already considered in the working capital adjustment.
TP Adjustment - Interest on delayed receivables - The ITAT found that the conditions laid down by previous rulings, specifically in the case of PCIT vs. Kusum Healthcare, were met, justifying the inclusion of interest on delayed receivables as a separate international transaction. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper inquiry by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) over time to identify patterns indicating benefits to AEs, and rejected the appellant's argument that the receivables' impact was already considered in the working capital adjustment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.