Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Disallowance of CSR amount u/s 37(2) - reason to believe or suspect - tangible material to reopen - AO power to review not to be confused with the power to re-assess - The petitioner argued that the notice was based on a change of opinion and lacked fresh tangible material. They also contested the treatment of CSR expenses and claimed that their practice was lawful. The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the notice for reopening the assessment was invalid and unsustainable, and the treatment of CSR expenses was permissible under the law. - The Court agreed with the petitioner's contention that donations made to eligible trusts, even if funded by CSR, qualified for deduction under Section 80G of the Act
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Disallowance of CSR amount u/s 37(2) - reason to believe or suspect - tangible material to reopen - AO power to review not to be confused with the power to re-assess - The petitioner argued that the notice was based on a change of opinion and lacked fresh tangible material. They also contested the treatment of CSR expenses and claimed that their practice was lawful. The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the notice for reopening the assessment was invalid and unsustainable, and the treatment of CSR expenses was permissible under the law. - The Court agreed with the petitioner's contention that donations made to eligible trusts, even if funded by CSR, qualified for deduction under Section 80G of the Act
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
