Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Corporate Social Responsibility - Determination of net worth - Company fall within the purview of section 135 of Companies Act or not - Exclusion of reserves created from amalgamation - The High court found that the petitioner company did not comply with the CSR obligations despite having a net worth exceeding the prescribed threshold. The court noted that the company failed to make CSR expenditures or provide reasons for not doing so in its Board's report, as required by the law. - The court disagreed with the petitioners’ interpretation of net worth. It held that the benefits of excluding reserves created from amalgamation from the net worth calculation do not extend beyond the year of amalgamation. Consequently, the petitioners could not continuously exclude these reserves to avoid CSR obligations in subsequent years. - There is thus sufficient materials on record making out a prima facie case against the petitioners in respect of the offences alleged.
Corporate Social Responsibility - Determination of net worth - Company fall within the purview of section 135 of Companies Act or not - Exclusion of reserves created from amalgamation - The High court found that the petitioner company did not comply with the CSR obligations despite having a net worth exceeding the prescribed threshold. The court noted that the company failed to make CSR expenditures or provide reasons for not doing so in its Board's report, as required by the law. - The court disagreed with the petitioners’ interpretation of net worth. It held that the benefits of excluding reserves created from amalgamation from the net worth calculation do not extend beyond the year of amalgamation. Consequently, the petitioners could not continuously exclude these reserves to avoid CSR obligations in subsequent years. - There is thus sufficient materials on record making out a prima facie case against the petitioners in respect of the offences alleged.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
