Charitable registration renewal cannot become an assessment of receipts, profitability or annual exemption compliance, requiring renewal and donation ...
AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjust...
Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Scope of SCN - Refund claim - Unutilised Input Tax Credit (ITC) - applicability of principle of res judicata - Adherence to the Accounting Standards or not - Specific goods have not been capitalised by the Petitioner in accordance with Accounting Standard 10. - The Court found merit in the Company's contention that the tax authorities' approach lacked consistency. It emphasized the importance of uniform treatment for similar factual and legal circumstances, highlighting that the arbitrary withholding of refunds for the disputed periods was unjustified.
Scope of SCN - Refund claim - Unutilised Input Tax Credit (ITC) - applicability of principle of res judicata - Adherence to the Accounting Standards or not - Specific goods have not been capitalised by the Petitioner in accordance with Accounting Standard 10. - The Court found merit in the Company's contention that the tax authorities' approach lacked consistency. It emphasized the importance of uniform treatment for similar factual and legal circumstances, highlighting that the arbitrary withholding of refunds for the disputed periods was unjustified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.