Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Scope of SCN - Refund claim - Unutilised Input Tax Credit (ITC) - applicability of principle of res judicata - Adherence to the Accounting Standards or not - Specific goods have not been capitalised by the Petitioner in accordance with Accounting Standard 10. - The Court found merit in the Company's contention that the tax authorities' approach lacked consistency. It emphasized the importance of uniform treatment for similar factual and legal circumstances, highlighting that the arbitrary withholding of refunds for the disputed periods was unjustified.
Scope of SCN - Refund claim - Unutilised Input Tax Credit (ITC) - applicability of principle of res judicata - Adherence to the Accounting Standards or not - Specific goods have not been capitalised by the Petitioner in accordance with Accounting Standard 10. - The Court found merit in the Company's contention that the tax authorities' approach lacked consistency. It emphasized the importance of uniform treatment for similar factual and legal circumstances, highlighting that the arbitrary withholding of refunds for the disputed periods was unjustified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.