Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Liability to charge GST - Public Distribution System (PDS) - Fair Price Shop - Supply of goods i.e. S. K. Oil to ration card holders - license issued by the Government of West Bengal, authorizing as a “Dealer” as defined under Kerosene Control Order, 1968 - The AAAR held that their services were exempt from GST, rendering the question of charging GST to the State Government inapplicable. - The AAAR concluded that since the appellant acted as an agent for the State Government and their services were exempt from GST, the ancillary charges associated with the distribution of SK Oil were also not subject to GST. - On the issue of composite supply, AAAR held that it was identified as a single supply of service to the State Government by distributing SK Oil to ration card holders. Therefore, the concept of composite supply was not applicable to this case.
Liability to charge GST - Public Distribution System (PDS) - Fair Price Shop - Supply of goods i.e. S. K. Oil to ration card holders - license issued by the Government of West Bengal, authorizing as a “Dealer” as defined under Kerosene Control Order, 1968 - The AAAR held that their services were exempt from GST, rendering the question of charging GST to the State Government inapplicable. - The AAAR concluded that since the appellant acted as an agent for the State Government and their services were exempt from GST, the ancillary charges associated with the distribution of SK Oil were also not subject to GST. - On the issue of composite supply, AAAR held that it was identified as a single supply of service to the State Government by distributing SK Oil to ration card holders. Therefore, the concept of composite supply was not applicable to this case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
